This means if your opponent is sitting on $10K and you have $300, he can’t win any more money from you even if you’ve called his “all-in” bet. While Will’s argument that his $300 stack represents only a small portion of his opponent’s much bigger stack is true, the simple fact is that it doesn’t matter in games that are being played with table stakes.Īs is the rule in nearly every casino, cash game players can only lose the amount of money they have in front of them at the start of any given hand. Will’s argument was that by adopting this policy, the games are inherently unfair because the room is letting players with large bankrolls run over little guys like himself. Specifically, Will’s issue was with the room’s policy of not capping the buy-ins for any of its games, allowing players to put as much money as they want on the table, even in a low-limit $1-2 game. In our conversation, my friend - let’s call him Will - was complaining about the structures used in a new poker room he’d recently discovered. Think of it as an opportunity instead of an obstacle. Don’t be intimidated by an opponent’s large chip stack. He was telling me that he thought there should be caps on buy-ins for No-Limit games because they protect the little player from getting run over by a deep-pocketed bully. I recently had an argument with a fellow poker player.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |